Re: IDNA2008 change impact on installation size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:05:50PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> has any consideration been give to the size increase required by the
> change from libidn (678k) to libidn2 + libunistring (228k + 1246k)?
> That's not *too* bad, since currently none of the things which depend
> on idn end up in the initramfs, but still, it's noticeable.

Thanks for considering this angle. Is there a way to reduce that? Looks
like libunistring is just... large.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux