On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:44:16AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > There is a bit of a problem with that, though, and packages that > > iterate quickly. 52.0-6 went stable on 2017-03-24. 52.0-7 went stable > > on 2017-03-30. 52.0.2-2 went stable on 2017-04-05. There isn't a week > > between any of those; given that (IIRC) GNOME is designed to notify > > users of updates only once a week, it's quite easy to *not* be going > > from 'latest minus 1' to 'latest' in this kind of scenario. > > Yeah, that's fair. I'm not sure of a really good solution for this > other than ostree-based flatpaks — and that has its own challenges. Maybe we could introduce time-based criteria for dprms and 1) remove drpms only when they are 10 days old (or use a better threshold) and support using multiple drpms to generate the final RPM: e.g. use foo-1_2.drpm and foo-2_3.drpm to generate foo-3.rpm from foo-1.rpm 2) generate drpms for all recent (up to 10 days old) update paths if the drpm chain from 1) is bigger/close to the size of the final RPM Both probably also need some tooling updates. Kind regards Till _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
