Re: Modularity and lifecycle [was Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:09:47AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Kevin, I genuinely don't understand your worry here. If Fedora had a
> > long per-release lifetime already, and we were talking about shortening
> > it, that'd be one thing, but I think the most common situation will
> > actually be modules which have *longer* lifetime, and which provide
> > continuity across base releases.
> A Fedora release has a 13-month lifetime. There were ideas floating around 
> about module branch lifetimes in the order of a couple weeks!

I think something with a lifetime like that would be quite exceptional.
Maybe for very young and rapidly-evolving software — but that's
probably better left in Copr or somewhere like that. There are a lot of
potential policy knobs we can set how we like as a project.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux