Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/22/2017 06:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:22:23PM -0700, stan wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +0000
>> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...snip...

>> Maybe you should try installing the i686 key package?
> 
> Oh right, well spotted.
> 
> Yes, I wanted to compile a program with `gcc -m32' (it's some Wii tool
> which is derived from Windows software so it makes 32 bit assumptions
> all over the place).
> 
> So this is a DNF bug, I suppose?

No, I think it's the fedora-release bug mentioned above.

If you had a older fedora-repos-25 installed, it had a wrong/old/never
used version of the Fedora 26 key.

For f25 and before there's 2 keys per release: a primary key and a
secondary key. For f26 and later there are still two keys, but only s390
is signed by the secondary one now.

i686 and x86_64 have always been signed by the same key.

kevin




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux