> I'd like to ship a 3.1 M6 (or some stable incremental build between then > and FC4 freeze) with FC4 and then update to M7 and 3.1 final as they come > out. Me too. Because of ... > - awesome new plug-ins like Jeff Pound's ongoing work on the Bugzilla > plug-in are dependent upon 3.1 (without a tonne of back-porting) Thing like that, which would make the development life-cycle process in eclipse more complete .. and .. > - making RPMs will be much simpler than how we're doing the 3.0.1 now Organization of above. > I'd like to go with 3.1, but we'll need to do lots of testing and > bug-fixing. The number of gcj/libgcj hackers capable of fixing bugs isn't > that high and even getting things down to test cases is not an easy task. > I'd like to hear people's opinions. I'll help where I can. In porting the plug-ins (CDT, ChangeLog, RPM import/export, etc) I expect some cross experience to apply. Regards Phil
