On 03/18/2017 10:11 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczko.tomasz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you try to link it against uClibc?
> If t is about executable size depends which one libc functions linking with
> uClibc should give you waay smaller binaries.
> Please just try :)
> *Install please uClibc-devel package and put -L%{_*libdir}/uClibc before
> all -l<foo> parameters.
You should consider switching to uClibc-ng [1].
uClibc project is frozen, latest release [2] was done five years ago and last
git commit [3] nearly two.
[1] https://www.uclibc-ng.org/
[2] https://www.uclibc.org/news.html
[3] https://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/log/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
