Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/15/2017 05:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> 
> Sure, if udev maintainers are willing to ship the kvm rule by default,
> that's fine with me for reason you suggest. I simply don't think it'll
> have any effect on usage of /dev/kvm inside containers
> 

Does that mean you assume my scenario I outlined is incorrect? The
only reason we are having this discussion is because i found that
changing the permissions of /dev/kvm on the host from 600 to 666 made
it so that I could run libvirt inside a container, which would mean
that if does have an effect on usage of /dev/kvm inside a container.

I could be "using it wrong", but would like for you to tell me why
what I'm doing is invalid.

Dusty
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux