On 03/13/2017 03:23 PM, Parag Nemade wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/13/2017 10:38 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Is this not enough [1] or you want to make the reviews part of orphaning
process?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
The latter. [1] is not enough, because it leaves stalled reviews as
"assigned" with most persons (esp. the package submitter) not noticing it.
From that page I think 1.1.2 is very much clear where I believe
reviewers are knowing all the policies that we have for Fedora
packaging and they can take actions given there but for 1.1.1 package
submitter need to know this policy page so that he can himself or
request someone to clear the fedora-review? flag. I don't think we
can/should enforce any criteria here to clear stalled reviews
automatically.
I think we need some kind of timeout automatism, e.g. to reassign all
reviews requests whose reviewers were inactive for some time (say 2 or 4
weeks).
Any packager can triage these stalled reviews as per
policy [1].
In cases of people who were AWOL'ed by FESCO, I would expect this to be
part of the "closing down the FAS-account" job.
One technical and management problem also exist: FAS accounts and BZ
accounts are not connected at all.
Is this policy page [1] not approved by Fedora Packaging Committee already?
I don't know, but don't think this page is FPCs job at all.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
