Re: Question on systemd service and "After=" directive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 03.03.17 22:03, Dario Lesca (d.lesca@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> Il giorno ven, 03/03/2017 alle 10.45 +0100, Lennart Poettering ha
> scritto:
> > It's entirely OK to order yourself after non-installed units. Simply
> > list the After= lines you need, and all is good. After= has no effect
> > if the specified unit doesn#t exist and generates no errors. It's
> > intended use of this option to reference non-existing units.
> 
> Then i can remove all comment to After= directive and, if one or more
> service are not installed, systemd do not waits for missing
> services before start gogs.service.
> 
> Is this behavior consistent across all versions of systemd and all
> distribution?

Yes.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux