Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-03-01)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/03/2017 10:48 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:

Wasn't there rule to remove packages after two failed mass rebuilds?

Besides the fact, there wasn't an F25 mass rebuild, which alone implies "2 failed mass rebuilds == 2+ years", this rule never really worked, IMO, because packages often FTBFS for trivial reasons (e.g. missing BRs) which were fixed as "easy fixes" by provenpackagers, resulting into the package surviving longer.

Just consider the openssl-1.1.0 case: Most packages which currently FTBS due to openssl-1.1.0 compatibility issues (Wild guess: 20+ packages), probably can be rebuilt by switching their specs to using compat-openssl-devel.

Ralf


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux