On 03/03/2017 10:48 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Wasn't there rule to remove packages after two failed mass rebuilds?
Besides the fact, there wasn't an F25 mass rebuild, which alone implies "2 failed mass rebuilds == 2+ years", this rule never really worked, IMO, because packages often FTBFS for trivial reasons (e.g. missing BRs) which were fixed as "easy fixes" by provenpackagers, resulting into the package surviving longer.
Just consider the openssl-1.1.0 case: Most packages which currently FTBS due to openssl-1.1.0 compatibility issues (Wild guess: 20+ packages), probably can be rebuilt by switching their specs to using compat-openssl-devel.
Ralf _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx