On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 07:16, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/23/2017 02:23 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 00:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:53 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote: > > > > Dear Fedora developers, > > > > there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable branch > > > > brought in new dependencies and in significant numbers. The most recent > > > > case was discussed on this list even today: > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/BVUZWJYW2UVO53EZ2G2ALAQPU5PLDJZR/ > > > > > > That discussion was about Rawhide. Not about a stable release. > > > > True, but the issue is the same. New or changed dependencies cause > > problems. > > Not quite. This only applies to "weak deps". How so? > New "strong deps" or "changed deps" are should to solve problems, otherwise > there would not be any need for changes. "are should to"? Sorry, I can't understand the above sentence. > > The proposed policy change talks about both rawhide and stable branches. > I consider your proposal to be unnecessary. Could you elaborate on why you think it's unnecessary? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
