Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 11:50 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> > >> > On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 10:39 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> > > >> > > Per old thread, >> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorap >> > > roje >> > > ct.org/thread/D4QXJ5HBCNJJYWHB7SPOQWL57QMMC63O/ >> > > >> > > kde-sig retired kdebindings (virtual package), and orphaned the >> > > following >> > > today: >> > > >> > > kimono >> > > ruby-korundum >> > > ruby-qt >> > > smokeqt >> > > smokekde >> > > qyoto >> > >> > "Of these, I can see *maybe* keeping perl-Qt (and dep smokeqt), >> > primarily because it is the only one in this list that's not a leaf >> > package (debconf- kde depends on it). " >> > >> > debconf-kde still need perl-Qt and perl-Qt use libQtCore.so.4 and >> > also >> > depends on smokeqt >> > >> > why we want orphan qt4 bindings ? >> > BTW I just add some of these packages to epel7 [1] What is your >> > advise, >> > idea or notes ? >> >> Note we only orphaned these (not eol/retired). If you have any >> interest in >> keeping these alive, feel free to take them. >> >> Be warned, most(all?) of them are unmaintained upstream and have >> rawhide FTBFS issues. > Anyway perl-Qt is not in the list of packages to be retired , not retired, orphaned. But yes, kde-sig only orphaned packages for which it is directly responsible. > can we build perl-Qt without smokeqt ? any other solution ? perl-Qt's smokeqt requirement is non-optional as far as I can tell. If you want to keep perl-Qt, you'll need to help keep it's dependencies (like smokeqt) alive as well. -- Rex _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
