Le mercredi 26 janvier 2005 Ã 20:17 +0100, FÃliciano Matias a Ãcrit : > Le mercredi 26 janvier 2005 Ã 15:38 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a Ãcrit : > > Le mercredi 26 janvier 2005 Ã 15:24 +0100, Tarjei Knapstad a Ãcrit : > > > On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 14:47, Build System wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > New package jakarta-commons-beanutils > > > > Jakarta Commons BeanUtils Package > > > > > > > > > > <snip more Jakarta and Struts packages> > > > > > > Hmm, I thought you were striving to reduce the amount of packages going > > > into Core? Just asking really, but is Jakarta and Struts something that > > > should be in Core? If so, why? What makes them important "base > > > distribution" packages? > > > > > > (Sorry if I missed something and this is something that'll be moved to > > > Pre-Extras) > > > > Obviously that's a lot of stuff that will be used in RHEL. > > I don't remember Red Hat stating that Fedora *Core* have a direct > relationship this RHEL. > > For me, RHEL can be : > FC + FE + other things One big reason RH is in Fedora is for the RHEL it makes out of it One big reason a lot of people use Fedora is the RedHat touch they get for free. So it's a symbiotic relationship. I for one would be the last to complain I have access in FC to large parts of RHEL. We're not talking about resources Red Hat is taking from parts of Fedora to reallocate elsewhere (which is IMHO a large part of what's extra is about). We're talking about ressources Red Hat already allocated for its *paying* customers and is sharing for free with FC users (If you just take a peek at who's maintaining the java packages you'll see they're not people already contributing heavily to other parts of FC. So don't worry your packages are safe). Complaining about a free gift is not overly polite. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
