On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> By the way, this isn't true at all. Most packages can and, these days, >> are encouraged to ship their own SELinux policies. > > This is also a plague because it drags in SELinux dependencies that would > not otherwise be necessary on a system with SELinux disabled. E.g., > dnfdaemon even drags in policycoreutils-python-utils, selinux-policy, etc., > which is IMHO absolutely unacceptable. There's some that certainly drag in more of selinux than they need to for applying the policy and they're, in IMO, packaging bugs and should be fixed. Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
