On 01/20/2017 11:55 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > We can classify properties into 2 categories: used by run-time loader, > not used by run-time loader. We put properties for run-time loader into > .note.gnu.property section and the rest into GNU attribute section. Agreed. Can we use the same noun/adjective for our names? Is there any reason to use property over attribute? As a Friday bikeshed I suggest: .note.gnu.attributes - GNU Attributes optimized for the dynamic loader. -- New. Follows H.J's proposal. Bit-level, packed, and optimized for the dynamic loader processing. .gnu.attributes - GNU Attributes optimized for offline and static linker processing. -- Existing section. Discussions with Nick ongoing if we can continue to use existing infrastructure e.g. Tag_Range to extend this data. -- Cheers, Carlos. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
