Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:16 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Partly because there exist more than 2 architectures (think:
RV64G/RV64GC/RV128G, ARMv5/6/7/8, or less esoterically, having various
CPU features like SSE or AVX compiled in and out).  Partly because
there will be fewer differences between Fedora & Debian/Ubuntu which
means less friction and more chance of a random proprietary binary
simply working.

Rich.
Random proprietary binaries do not, by definition, simply work. Proprietary binaries work *if* the proprietor has *tested* them on the specific distro and architecture. This isn't a game of chance, this is a software engineering effort, hopefully with a payoff of some kind for the proprietor and the platform vendor.
--
How many people can stand on the shoulders of a giant before the giant collapses?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux