Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05/2017 11:17 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 05/01/17 16:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 
>> For many years, Fedora has supported multilib by carrying parallel-installable
>> libraries in /usr/lib[64]. This was necessary for a very long time in order to
>> support 32-bit applications running on a 64-bit deployment. However, in today's
>> new container world, there is a whole new option.
> 
> You may be living in a "new container world" but that doesn't mean the rest of
> us (or our users) are.
> 

By "new container world" I meant "a world where containers exist and can offer a
complete 32-bit runtime" rather than a hacked-in multilib runtime.

>> I'd like to propose that we consider moving away from our traditional approach
>> to multilib in favor of recommending the use of a 32-bit container runtime when
>> needed on a 64-bit host.
> 
> On the face of it it sounds like a terrible idea but perhaps I have
> misunderstood the consequences.
> 
> Can you explain what this would actually mean for an average software developer
> trying to build a 32 bit program?
> 
> Take for example my day job where I'm developing a proprietary application on a
> Fedora workstation. Now mostly I use a 64 bit build of the software but we have
> a few databases we support where the vendor doesn't provide 64 bit libraries so
> I have to use a 32 bit build.
> 
> Would this mean I had to do some special dance to enter a container environment
> in order to work with a 32 bit build rather than just telling our build scripts
> to use "gcc -m32" when compiling?
> 

Building of software shouldn't be changed at all in most cases. The main
difference would be installation/deployment. The idea would be that instead of
the 32-bit and 64-bit runtimes being installed directly in parallel on the base
system, they would instead be installed into effectively a chroot with its own
completely 32-bit runtime.

In practical terms, this would be akin to installing it on a 32-bit VM, except
without the overhead and a separate kernel.

It gets a bit fuzzier when it has to interact with certain system services (see
the "Open Questions" for some examples).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux