On 12/30/2016 01:44 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/30/2016 12:49 PM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> My latest build [1] of dnsdist failed on ppc64, because libatomic is not >> in the default buildroot there, as opposed to all the other arches. >> Is this intentional? Should I just add libatomic as a BR? >> >> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17115104 > > dnsdist-1.1.0/m4/pdns_check_os.m4 has this: > > case "$host" in > mips*) > LDFLAGS="-latomic $LDFLAGS" > ;; > powerpc*) > LDFLAGS="-latomic $LDFLAGS" > ;; > esac > > If you link against libatomic explicitly, you need to specify a > suitable build dependency. > > (If the dependency on libatomic is introduced by a build dependency, > that build dependency would in turn have to depend on libatomic, and > not your package.) Understood, but why do the aarch64, armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le buildroot have this by default, but not ppc64? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
