Re: noarch package built differently...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:24:03 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

> OK, maybe you're talking about having %{_isa} in the spec file, ie:
> 
>   %package doc
>   ...
>   BuildArch: noarch
>   Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> 
> ?  That would make the dependency include "(x86-64)" (or whatever
> arch the noarch package built on) and that would be wrong.

Which is an arch-specific dependency as mentioned in the guidelines
(in the base Requires section).
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux