On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:08:13AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Idea #1: Do not block on optical media issues for Alpha and Beta releases > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > This is the less controversial idea, I believe. We received a concern > from Matthew, who was worried that we might find out too late if we > don't check it for Alpha/Beta. I partly agree, but believe we should > solve it with an improved QA processes, instead of bumping the > release criteria to apply earlier. He did not object to this, and > nobody else did, so I assume everyone agrees :-) If there are no > further concerns, I'll prepare a criterion adjustment proposal for > this. +1 > This was received with reasonably positive reception as well. But > it's harder to compile a list which images should be covered by > criteria and which not. > - Workstation Live will be covered, that's clear - we give out these > DVDs at events, it's sent out to the developing world > - Everything netinst is the most universal and generic netinst, so > covering that one means we don't need to cover Workstation netinst > and Server netinst. People seem to agree to this. +1 > - Nobody argued for KDE Live. We probably don't bulk press KDE Live > DVDs. If we cover Workstation Live, it's improbable that only KDE > Live would break, but not impossible. If such thing happens, are > people OK with releasing Fedora XX KDE Live only bootable over USB? I continue to believe we need the ability to release Spins independent of the main release cycle. If there's a KDE-specific problem, rather than that holding up the release *or* waiting six to eight months for it to work again, there should be the ability to have it fixed a week later. Or for that matter, if Workstation slips a month and KDE doesn't want to, should be fine. I know that we're not there yet, but I'll keep repeating it as a desired state. :) > - Server DVD is a mixed bag. Matthew didn't include it in his > block-list, Adam did. Neal uses it over IMPI (but netinst would be > good enough for him IIUIC, sans some package deps issue which can > be solved using a kickstart). I would appreciate more feedback from > Server folks. Again, we'll cover netinst so it's improbable DVD > would break, but not impossible. Are people OK releasing it only > bootable over USB (and PXE)? I think netinst + USB covers the Server case well enough. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
