Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 12/07/2016 04:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>> -1 at least for the moment. b
>>
>>
>> Is this due to sugar? Would you accept patches?
>
> One of the reasons, and of course, I think if we want to actively
> retire packages we need to enage with the owners of the dependencies.

And yes, already engaging with the upstream. Just not all upstreams
have a lot of resources to chase fixes for things they see as already
working.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux