> On 7 Dec 2016, at 18:20, Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks for reply
>
> On Qua, 2016-12-07 at 11:56 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2016-12-07 11:49, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, like webkit < 3 retirement , you shouldn't repoquery with
>>> --recursive, If I am correct .
>>>
>>> Again after wxGTK and wxGTK3 be updated all dependencies will be
>>> solved
>>> automatically , also same case for wxPython , If I am correct.
>> Incorrect. I was talking about gstreamer-python, not wxPython.
>> Furthermore, wxGTK's gstreamer dependency is already isolated in
>> wxGTK{,3}-media, so only its reverse dependencies are affected, not
>> everything that uses wxGTK.
>
> Yes, I mention wxGTK{,3} because we have other process similar to this
> around webkit [1]
>
>>>
>>> What I mean is: first we should concern in --whatrequires
>>> gstreamer-
>>> 0.10 directly to understand what really is in question .
>> Anything which --whatrequires gstreamer-python is clearly affected as
>> well.
>
> But for gstreamer-python we don't have gstreamer1-python ? so how we
> can fix the packages that have dependencies on gstreamer-python ?
>
We do, however, have python-gstreamer1 in both flavours (Python 2 and Python 3), which is the extras on top of GI to make it easy to work with.
> As part of a global ideia of maintain packages, should be good have
> specialists in migrating components, in this case gstreamer0 to
> gstreamer1.
>
> Also do all migrations (maintain) of all the packages together could be
> more efficient (just an ideia).
>
> [1]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375846
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Simon Farnsworth
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
