Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/2016 04:39 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
It looks like probably Dominik's suggestion of the -e cleared the
program.  So somehow, rpm -e packagename seemed to be the magic bullet.
 I will start overwith the update to make sure all the packages
downloaded, and let you know if success happens.
FWIW, I had several file conflicts resulting from standard F24 packages that blocked the upgrade to F25.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396848

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396849

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396319

that required    dnf erase <offendingpackage>. Sometimes these erasures had a slightly worrying amount of dependencies (a dozen, not hundreds, though), and in each case they reinstalled smoothly after the OS upgrade. Two of those have been promptly fixed by the packagers, and apparently are no longer an isssue.

This got me thinking if there's a common root cause that could be checked automatically? I didn't quite understand what exactly happened in the affected packages to cause it.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux