-----Original Message----- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:54:13 +0100 On Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 21:40, Howard Howell wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: hlhowell@xxxxxxxxxxx, Development discussions related to Fedora > <de > vel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Adam Williamson <adamwill@fedoraproject > .o > rg> > Subject: Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:37:04 -0800 > > > > > On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Howard Howell wrote: > > > > > > > > > Now it gets really weird... > > > # rpm -q --provides google-earth > > > package google-earth is not installed > > > > Should be google-earth-stable, no? > > ********************* > > Different results: > rpm -q --provides google-earth-stable > google-earth = 7.1.7.2606 > google-earth-stable = 7.1.7.2606-0 > google-earth-stable(x86-64) = 7.1.7.2606-0 > > But not the one with the issue??? Yes, because dnf complains about issues with the updated google-earth-stable package, not the current one. Try `rpm -e google-earth-stable'. Regards, Dominik PS. Your quoting is bad (no indentation, so it misattributes quotes) and this is really not a topic for the developers list. # rpm -e google-earth-stable [root@school log]# Well, I tried the users list, no reply. I did google, bugzilla, and checked as many search terms as I could. Upgrades via dnf are relatively new, and since it was not on bugzilla, I thought before I submitted one I should have sufficient supporting information on what exactly is the bug. A non conforming package is going to happen on the cutting edge, so this is something that bears investigation by the developers, I would think. Also if investigation proves that I caused it then providing people with information to avoid the issue would be good, wouldn't it? However installing a non supported package should not prevent an upgrade, should it? Regards, Les H _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
