Base Runtime prototype build and numerous FTBFS issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

during the Tuesday's Modularity WG meeting I was talking about the status
of the Base Runtime prototype build and the package build failures we
encountered during our latest attempt.  The meeting log is here:

https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/modularity_wg/modularity_wg.2016-11-29-15.00.log.html

In short: To bootstrap the Modularity infra (yeah, it's still not done)
we took a (fairly large) set of packages directly from Fedora 25 RC3
and put them all in one, self-hosting module, currently misleadingly
labeled as base-runtime.  The next step was to rebuild this set using
only the packages in it, preferrably twice, to prove it works, produces
the same, reproducible builds (or as close as we can get) and to save us
from sudden, unexpected breakage later when we need to touch components
deep in the [build] dependency chain.

(Since this is a common question: No, the final Base Runtime module,
or the Generational Core stack it is part of, won't be self-hosting and
we won't be shipping the entire set we're currently working with under
that name.)

We attempted to rebuild 2943 SRPMs and encountered 152 failures.
The reasons vary and include undiscovered conditional build dependencies,
undeclared build or runtime dependencies in combination with recent
buildroot and other package dependency chains changes, packages no
longer being compatible with their updated dependencies, random hangs
or non-deterministic, randomly failing test suites, to name a few.

Some but not all of those affect, and can be reproduced in, the traditional
Fedora release, too, and fixing these issues is not only crucial for the
upcoming modular Fedora 26 Server but will benefit the standard Fedora
release as well.

We'll be working on resolving these failures during the upcoming few weeks
-- via FTBFS bug reports or immediate fixes in the most trivial cases.
We'll use the following tracker bug for this purpose:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400162

For the curious, the logs are here:
https://psabata.fedorapeople.org/f25rc3-failures/

And the modulemd input for this build is here:
http://pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/cgit/modules/base-runtime.git/tree/base-runtime.yaml?id=d2485512c7916304e73fabc5db422798eb2be1d5

If you maintain some of these FTBFS'd packages, feel free to fix them
even before we get to you! :) Just, please, let us know if you do.

Finally, some quick test instructions: Make sure your package builds
in F25 and Rawhide.  If it does, check whether it also builds in mock
using this configuration file: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/494173/
If it works there as well, chances are it's fine.

Thank you in advance,
P

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux