On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:51:14 -0000, carlos.soriano89@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > "There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy with > the feature set" > We are never completely happy, after all we are quite demanding. > However there are few reasons why it's not excellent for your use case, > one of the reasons is simply we don't have that use case and we didn't > took it into account, so please file a bug explaining clearly and > shortly what is your use case and why current approach is not enough. > It's also helpful if you compare with other state of the art file > managers providing some ideas. That would accelerate greatly the > process. I've explained it in this thread in a clear way. There won't be anything beyond that for some time, since I don't want to speed up anything. This topic is to get feedback from others. Maybe it's just me, who thinks the progress window is flawed. You certainly sound as if it would require much effort to convince you (or other developers) as long as you believe the current approach might be enough or my use case would be too odd. Then it's flawed by design because of applying a philosophy that only caters for simple usage scenarios. Quick and short operations that don't clutter up the progress display for a longer time. [Is the use case really that odd? I don't think so. Personally, I still use Midnight Commander in multiple terminals more often than Nautilus.] Comparing with "other state of the art file managers" doesn't interest me much either, since simply stopping the window from jumping to the top of the list automatically would "fix" the most annoying problem and would make the scrollbar usable, which would be the only point of including a scrollbar in that window anyway. F25 Firefox just crashed for me while filling in the GNOME bugzilla advanced search form. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
