Re: upstream dev. asks suggestions about howto make packagers work easier (bundled libraries, etc.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 08:48:27AM +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> We often deal with upstream developers that bundle libraries in their
> code, so to make a package we have to debundle them, etc.
> This time, an upstream dev. asked me what he could do to make easier
> the work of packagers.
> In this case the software is python-netjsongraph [1] that bundles
> javascript-d3 library and that is being reviewd at [2]
> 
> I think it would be nice to make a discussion even for non Python
> packages, so we can elaborate a sort of vademecum that a packager
> could show to upstreams when there is a collaboration between them.

I think it comes down to:
- don't bundle,
- if you have to bundle, provide an easy and unambiguous configure switch
  to use the system version of the dependency,
- never, never, patch stuff in-tree.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux