On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:02:44PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> >>> Alogn with this I realized that pygpgme spec needs some love (like >>> cleaning stuff, adding %check section to run tests, backporting >>> patches) and renaming, so I sent new one for review[5] and created >>> repo with our (Fedora) fixes on top of dead upstream package[6]. >> >> This is awesome. Did you by any chance get in touch with other >> distributions to get them switch to the new fork as well? > No, I didn't. Unfortunately I don't know what's the usual way of doing > this. Help is very welcomed! > > Actually since gpgme-1.7.0 it should include py2/py3 bindings and all > people who are using pygpgme are encouraged to use official bindings. > Unfortunately it's still not available in fedora as we stuck with > 1.6.0, because there are some problems with libgcrypt-x.y.z. I'm a bit wrong here, we can get 1.7.0 and I'm working on it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378056. >> >> Kind regards >> Till >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > -- > -Igor Gnatenko -- -Igor Gnatenko _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx