Re: What to do when you have a bundled library that has no upstream and you don't know the version?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/11/2016 08:59 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
Hello Friends!

Igor and I were having a discussion on a package review ticket[0] about
how to handle a bundled library that seems to have no upstream that
either of us can find, and for which we don't know its version!

According to the packaging guidelines, it is OK to bundle the library
in certain circumstances, but the package must use Provides:
bundled(<libname>) = <version> in the spec file.

Since we don't know the version, it's difficult to know what to do
here. Also, since we don't know the upstream, it would be difficult to
get the package packaged separately to do it the "nice" way.

What should we do? Is it OK to pass the review with just Provides:
bundled(<libname>) in this edge case?

yes, that's fine.


--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux