Should we stop stripping static libraries?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We currently call /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive from %__os_install_post. This removes debugging symbols from static (.a) libraries.

Is this really a good idea? Due to this, glibc copies libc.a to glibc-debuginfo, so that you can get a link with debugging symbols by specifying “-static -L/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64“ (potentially with unintended side effects). I would like to get this to work by default.

If developers does not want debugging symbols and static libraries have them, they can link with -s, or strip the linked object.

Thoughts?

I can file a Fedora 26 system-wide change for this if this warrants one.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux