On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:44:25PM -0800, Japheth Cleaver wrote: > If we really don't have a better, persistent, local name for a > system at install time, then I don't see why reverting to > /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 is horrible here. VG names should be > human-readable and exist in a namespace; shouldn't uniqueness should > be from VG/LV UUIDs when we need it? We explicitly switched from VolGroup00/LogVol00 because it caused problems if you tried to mount virtual machine disks on the host (of course you should use libguestfs instead, but some people still try to do this). The bug was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207470 Why don't we just use randomized vgXXXXXX/lvXXXXXX names here, independent of the hostname? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
