Re: RFH: Annotating ELF binaries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/07/2016 07:00 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

The only sensible way to write the psABI is for it to say "this is how
to pass an 80 or 128 bit floating point value."  The psABI can't say

I would advise using IEEE 754-2008 names in psABIs where available (e.g.
binary128).  (Of course you need to deal with the non-IEEE types such as
x86 extended precision, but IEEE names are standard and unambiguous up to
endianness for binary interchange formats, and unambiguous up to
endianness and BID / DPD choice for decimal interchange formats.)

Most people in the community don't have access to IEEE 754-2008 and therefore will not know what these terms mean (and considering how much stuff has been made up about IEEE 754 due to its secretive nature, I wouldn't want to rely on a paraphrase).

Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux