On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:05:03PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >> Example output for the /boot sub-tree on my daily driver: >> >> grub2-efi-2.02-0.34.fc24.x86_64 >> └── /boot/efi/EFI/fedora >> mactel-boot-0.9-13.fc24.x86_64 >> ├── /boot/efi/.VolumeIcon.icns >> ├── /boot/efi/System/Library/CoreServices/SystemVersion.plist >> ├── /boot/efi/System/Library/CoreServices/boot.efi >> └── /boot/efi/mach_kernel >> shim-0.8-9.x86_64 >> ├── /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI >> └── /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/fallback.efi > > It'd be even more useful to print owning package after each file name, > so that people can easily search for their own packages. I don't see how that's a problem, I had no issue looking for the packages I maintain. If you want this kind of output, terminate the script at the end of the `while read perm path` loop. >> Thoughts? > Why not paste the output of the script here? I can share that, I did some filtering in my report to remove non Fedora packages. If people maintaining RPM Fusion see this message, I had openshot, kdenlive and vlc packages or sub-packages in my results. For Fedora itself, please find my report [1] probably too big to inline in this email. I have also updated the script to deal with a corner case and only use ASCII characters. Cheers, Dridi [1] https://paste.fedoraproject.org/467731/14780369/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
