----- Original Message ----- From: "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, python-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 9:23:51 PM Subject: Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora > How do you propose we do that? I can imagine patching the interpreter > to print some warning about this every time it's run, but I wonder > if that's too much to ask. This is possible. > I am not denying the usefulness, though I wonder why you would want to > test against an unmaintained branch. I can see a case for python-2.6, > which will be maintained by Red Hat for a couple more years and I'd expect > the Fedora maintainer to either be the same person who maintains it in > RHEL or that they follow the RHEL package closely otherwise. That holds true for the Fedora maintainer(s) of these packages, I don't know why you would assume otherwise. Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
