>> My recollection is grubby was going to get a rethink, but I don't know >> the scope. There are test cases built-into grubby that are considered >> valuable, I'm not sure about the rest. Gene found the code difficult. >> I think the main issue is, whether grubby or something else, it needs >> to be easier to follow the trail of breadcrumbs, self describing. If >> it's too easy, of course, it just means telling different people "no" >> about their use case. If you're going to support all use cases that's >> hard to invent and maintain. See GRUB. > > IMHO, you should just drop grubby entirely and configure GRUB the way > upstream intended. As you wrote in the other thread: Except that grubby doesn't just configure grub, it's also used for syslinux/extlinux boot options also in use in Fedora. Those use cases would need to be accounted for as well. Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
