On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Changed this subject to match the other one I changed, so if I'm doing > it wrong at least I'm consistent! > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So, I think we would need to get buyin to get our changes into the spec >> and get everyone to agree on it before we would want to move to it. > > The original spec is unworkable. And attempts to expand the upstream > spec for real world use cases needed in Fedora haven't gone anywhere. > It exchanges reduced complexity in the bootloader, by increasing it in > the installer and increasing wasted space on the drive. I'd try to > help make it salvageable but I think it's pointless. Make a Fedora > specific version and if people like it they can adopt it. Which, in effect, could just as well be writing a "specification" for grubby. I don't see the point in writing something nobody will adopt twice. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
