Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 00:05 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I don't want to get in the KDE folks' bad graces, but this likely could
> > also affect KDE's graphical update system, so I'd advise against using
> > that for the present too.
> 
> 
> Offline updates in KDE are just not going to happen any time soon.
> 
> 
> I also don't see offline updates as a reasonable solution to this problem:
> 
> * For this particular crash, the bug should simply be tracked down and
>   fixed.

We already did that, but two things:

1) that doesn't do a damn thing to help anyone who ran into it before
we tracked it down and fixed it. Offline updates sure were a great
*mitigation* before we fixed the bug.

2) the short-term fix is to remove the service restart from the package
scriptlets, but because the service restart was in the %postun
scriptlet, the update can't fix it immediately: indeed, *installing*
the update will inevitably trigger the bug. The update can only prevent
it happening for *subsequent* updates.

> * As a general workaround for this type of crashes, we need a
>   complete-transaction command in DNF – please add your voices to:
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091702
>   – and not the sledgehammer approach of doing all updates offline.

I'm certainly not opposed to improving the experience of recovering
from this kind of crash, but I'm really not a big fan of the message
'if the update process happens to crash X, hope you understood what
happened, and here's the magic recovery command you can run'.

I honestly think GNOME has this exactly right for the 'general' user:
the safe thing to do is to strongly encourage offline updates, i.e.
don't offer any online update mechanism through the desktop. In a
completely practical sense, given the current state of the tools and
the fact that we know bugs like this crop up - not *often*, but more
than *never* - I think it's a more responsible approach than running
the update process inside the desktop session.

Could KDE perhaps look into making it so the update process runs
outside of the desktop session somehow, if it's not going to go to
full-on offline updates 'any time soon'? I know this decision has its
own complexities, though.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux