On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:17:51AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Also membership on a WG isn't required for taking action; anyone who has +1 to this point. > they see fit. The WG exists mainly as an advisory body like FESCo: > it's really there mostly to set general direction and resolve > disputes. And to make it obvious who to come to if there is a problem. > Frankly, if someone comes and does a whole bunch of work for the > Server SIG, there's a high probability that they will eventually be > offered a seat on the WG as well. It's *intended* that the chairs be > held by people doing active work, so people semi-regularly decide to > give up their seat to others. More +1. > That being said, I'd kind of like to get to a point where Project FAO is > basically just a tool container running atop a Fedora Server os-tree image. That *definitely* argues for the merge — at least eventually. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
