Re: Missing dependency in glibc package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Björn Esser <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Forgot to mention:  Explicit dependencies are usually the better way,
> instead of relying on implicit dependencies…
>

Of course.

> File Dependencies
> RPM gives you the ability to depend on files instead of packages. Whenever possible you should avoid file dependencies as they slow down dependency resolution and require the package manager to download file lists in addition to to regular dependency information. There are, however, times when other technical considerations outweigh these considerations. If the files you need are prone to moving between packages of different names, it can be useful to depend on those files directly.

I found that a dependency on "setup" package is not common practice:

# dnf repoquery --whatrequires setup|wc -l
19

-- 
WBR,
  Roman Tsisyk <roman@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux