Allright, fair enough. Thanks for this feedback, I will adjust my expectations accordingly. Any tips maybe how to get the selinux-policy fixed for Zabbix in F24 though? Kind regards, Erik. Op 18-09-16 om 10:35 schreef Adam Williamson: > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 23:18 +0200, Erik Logtenberg wrote: >> On a side note, I am still puzzled that this package is non-functional >> in Fedora. Volker said he couldn't test on all Fedora releases, but is >> it not basic Fedora QA policy to at the very least test if a package >> actually runs on the current release with default settings? > > No. We don't systematically test all packages in the distribution, > there are far too many. Anyone giving positive karma on an update > should at least check it basically worked, but the last zabbix update > was not tested by anyone, it was pushed stable without feedback after > the minimum wait period expired. > >> I suppose such a basic test could even be automated relatively simply. > > Not...really, no. There are thousands of packages in the distribution. > Not all of them provide something you can 'run', exactly. Of the ones > that do, there is no particular single way you can test if they 'ran > OK'. Humans are good at this. Robots aren't. > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
