On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 16:39 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 16:13 +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:06:13 +0100 > > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 15:39 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > We will also > > > > add compat openssl102 package so the applications and other > > > > dependencies which are not ported yet to the new API continue to > > > > work. > > > > > > What plan do you have for libp11 and engine_pkcs11? > > > > FWIW engine_pkcs11 got retired recently IIRC, but strangely only in > > f25 > > It was retired because it is now combined with libp11. The package > engine_pkcs11 still exists. And I thought we'd done that in F24 too. We *certainly* shipped the newer libp11 which obsoletes it, even if we didn't manage to properly retire the engine_pkcs11 source package :) -- dwmw2
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx