Re: User Visible Terminology

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > This is for the labeling of, for example, separate PHP 5, 6, and 7
> > modules?
> 
> Yes.  Or even variations of the same upstream version.
> 
> I'm really pro-stream here because these identifiers have
> nothing to do with upgrade paths and some modules or module
> stacks wouldn't even have any concept of numbered, progressive
> builds/releases.  It's just a label.
> 
> I would save the word "version" to identify updates within
> these "streams".

I agree on not using "version" for this. I'm not completely sold on
"stream", partly because we talk about "upstream" and "downstream" so
much, and this is unrelated to that. How about "branch"? That fits with
the idea of "rebase" for switching between them....


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux