On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:33:12PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > I can believe it. > Maybe requiring the tester to say *how* they tested it, rather than > just "LGTM" which means basically nothing. We do have this technology. :) However, if we put the burden of figuring out what all needs to be tested completely on the testers, the net result is going to be more updates with no feedback at all, and then packagers/developers complaining that it's too onerous to get an update through — in this case, one which has a dozen security fixes. > > I repeat my call that packages should spend more time in testing. > Totally agree here. Probably, although just sitting there longer and not getting tested doesn't actually help. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
