On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have question, how you handle bugs where fix already available in >> upstream, but you don't want to backport that fix yet. What you do >> with bug in our trash-box (bugzilla.redhat.com)? > > Why don't you want to backport it? Sometimes it's too much work to backport if there are merge conflicts. > >> Probably you use whiteboard to indicate where it was fixed, close bug >> and write into comment that it will be fixed in next upstream release >> or ...? > > CLOSED->UPSTREAM or CLOSED->NEXTRELEASE both exist, but honestly I > would probably put the bug in DEFERRED if you plan to fix it but can't > yet for some reason. A comment describing the timeline for when the > fix will hit Fedora is probably sufficient. The key for any of these > states is to remember to actually do the fix. > > josh > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
