Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160913.n.1 compose check report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 20:13 +0000, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
> 
> 
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> 
> 
> Failed openQA tests: 8/92 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
> 
> 
> New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160912.n.0):
> 
> 
> ID: 34125	Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34125
> ID: 34126	Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34126
> ID: 34134	Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34134
> ID: 34205	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34205
> ID: 34208	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34208
> ID: 34210	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34210
> ID: 34213	Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34213
> ID: 34230	Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34230

The GNOME 'Getting Started' screen, which should appear after the
initial-setup wizard is complete, just doesn't seem to be showing up on
Rawhide at all. I'll reproduce this locally and file a bug soon.
There's also still an issue with things crashing and/or freezing on 32-
bit which I'm trying to look at locally.

> Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160912.n.0):
> 
> 
> ID: 34136	Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34136

This is still https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 ;.

> ID: 34145	Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34145

This is running into initial-setup bugs, I believe; we have two filed
as blockers:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374810
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374864

> ID: 34231	Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34231

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333591 is still going
strong...

> ID: 34236	Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/34236

A lorax update fixed the previous iSCSI bug, now we have a shiny new one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375712
> 
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux