Re: Unversioned and >/=/>= obsoletes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm going to do mass bug filling for those packages which are still
not fixed. Are there some scripts to do that or I have to write my
own?

Unfixed packages:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/broken-obsoletes/latest/broken-obsoletes.txt

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All guidelines mandate the use of </<= Obsoletes, but unfortunately we
> have some number of packages (179 source rpms -> 292 binary rpms) with
> unversioned Obsoletes or with >/=/>= Obsoletes.
>
> It is causing problems with upgrade (if package is getting re-added)
> or with 3rd-party repositories. Older package is obsoleting new
> package.
>
> Problem categories (in following text by "never" I mean latest N-2 releases):
>
> * Package/SubPackage was never built in Fedora
> Package "python" has "Obsoletes: python2" which was never built ->
> drop Obsoletes
> SubPackage "qpid-proton-c" of "qpid-proton" has "Obsoletes:
> qpid-proton" which was not the package for long time -> drop Obsoletes
>
> * Package replacement
> Package "storaged" has "Obsoletes: udisks2" -> take latest version
> from koji (2.1.7-1) and make Obsoletes versioned: udisks2 < 2.1.7-2
> storaged is not simple use-case as it replaces udisks2, but latter is
> still not retired.
>
> * "=" Obsoletes
> "rubygem-vte" has "Obsoletes: ruby-vte = 3.0.9-1.fc26" (probably it's
> macro in spec) which seems really weird as it will not obsolete
> F24/F25 with such version
>
> * Obsoletes by Provides
> It doesn't work to prevent undefined behavior. Imagine you have
> installed "A" and "B", both providing "C". Package "D" has "Obsoletes:
> C", it should not remove "A" and "B".
> ** %{?_isa}
> "glibc-headers" has "Obsoletes: glibc-headers(i686)". %{?_isa} is just
> text, it's not part of architecture or something else.
> ** Other provides
> "rubygem-http_connection" has "Obsoletes:
> rubygem(right_http_connection)". Latter is virtual provides.
>
> * Weird obsoletes (broken)
> "krb5-server" has "Obsoletes: krb5-server-1.14.3-8.fc26.i686".
> Basically it will not obsolete anything because it's threated as
> package name (and we definitely don't have such package name).
>
> * >/>= Obsoletes
> "vdsm" has "Obsoletes: vdsm-infra >= 4.16.0". It's almost same as
> unversioned Obsoletes. So it must not be used.
>
> Table of affected packages/maintainers:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/broken-obsoletes/2016-09-02/broken-obsoletes.txt
> --
> -Igor Gnatenko



-- 
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux