On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:14:13 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > All guidelines mandate the use of </<= Obsoletes, but unfortunately we > have some number of packages (179 source rpms -> 292 binary rpms) with > unversioned Obsoletes or with >/=/>= Obsoletes. > > It is causing problems with upgrade (if package is getting re-added) > or with 3rd-party repositories. Older package is obsoleting new > package. Good luck with trying to get some packagers to fix such issues! I appreciate the effort as I've reported similar things many times before, but some packagers just don't respond in bugzilla or overwrite changes applied to git after waiting months for a reply. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
