Re: My experiences with KillUserProcesses=yes on F24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:13:13AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Agreed. The acceptance of the feature without any logging, whatsoever,
> of what processes it killed and when shocked me. It's the sort of

But note that we _didn't accept the feature without any logging. And
see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357426#c3:

     Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-07-26 16:38:40 EDT

     Systemd-231 was compiled in rawhide today, with the first bit of
     implementation for this change: logging of left-over processes
     killed with SIGKILL/SIGABRT at notice level.

     I'm still working on the other parts.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux