On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati <fale@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: >> I have a strong opinion over this >> >> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level. >> And why i think of this ? >> >> Two simple reasons: >> - The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and then is >> far away from Fedora systems for some time >> - The packager is actively using Fedora, but seen not care to even properly >> take care of his package, not in the minimal sense to deny the ACL, which >> would be acceptable. >> >> In both cases, the package became hostage to someone that for sure aren't >> caring much for the distro, unless prove me wrong. > > Hi, > > On one hand I agree with you, on the other hand I do think that > sometimes pkgdb notifications are not so visible and therefore someone > could inadvertly loose track of some notifications and with your > proposal, this would trigger an auto-approval. The last time someone requested ACLs from one of my packages, I received an email about it. So if they're not reading email about their package, then that's a problem. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
