Re: Redefinition of the primary and secondary architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 15:56 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > 
> > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
> > 
> > I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused.
> > 
> > Will there be one Koji instance compiling for every (current primary +
> > current secondary) arch?  Or will there be two instances, one for all
> > primary and one for all secondary?
> > 
> 
> From what I can tell, shadow Koji instances are going away entirely.
> There will be one Koji system to rule them all.
> 
> > 
> > Will a build failure on (say) aarch64 prevent my package from
> > progressing to Rawhide (x86_64), bodhi etc?
> > 
> >                 -*- -*- -*-
> 
> That's what Adam Williamson seems to indicate, which I expect to be
> quite problematic.

The page explicitly states it, under "Will a single arch failure affect the overall build failure?"
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux